Dr. King's purpose is . Widely known for his work in the Civil Rights Movement, Martin Luther King Jr eventually also gained momentum in the anti-war movement against the war in Vietnam. Recognizing that citizens in poverty were not able to support their families while away from home at war, Martin Luther King included that war [and being enlisted in battle was] an enemy of poor to demonstrate how even though any man could be drafted, the economically stable left behind support for their family while the impoverished were ineligible of doing so (Source A). However, all wanted clarity on the subject. He proves that the government has been manipulating the poor when he writes, It was sending. This quote causes the audience to realize the contradiction in the Vietnam war policy, making them less likely to accept. In Hanoi are the men who led the nation to independence against the Japanese and the French, the men who sought membership in the French Commonwealth and were betrayed by the weakness of Paris and the willfulness of the colonial armies. Just talk to our smart assistant Amy and she'll connect you with the best [emailprotected] Likewise, the image of men, both black and while, "in brutal solidarity burning the huts of a poor village," helps establish the war in Vietnam as a complete disaster and atrocity. There were many reasons why so many Americans were against the war. His pleas are first to the audiences sense of logic and their immediate concerns for their own country. Get original paper in 3 hours and nail the task. No one should be restricted from rights and opportunities that others are given for that long. His use of diction and imagery arouses anger while increasing his credibility since he criticizes the unjust war he describes. Hence, Kings works always had the recurring theme of the unity and strength of combined willpower. It also describes the Jim Crow laws and the busboy cot from 1955. In this way, while he successfully draws a parallel between the struggles of Vietnamese people and that of the Americans, he also lays the foundation for the next stages of his argument. Overall, Martin Luther King Jr. eloquently argues against the United States involvement in Vietnam through his use of parallelism, diction, and imagery. We try to make TeenInk.com the best site it can be, and we take your feedback very seriously. In Dr. Martin Luther Kings speech Beyond VietnamA Time to Break Silence (1967), Dr. King asserts that the war in Vietnam is totally immoral and has far reaching negative implications not only for Vietnam, but for The United States and the rest of the World as well. Graduateway.com is owned and operated by Radioplus Experts Ltd Ethos, the appeal to the legitimacy and authority of the speaker, is used throughout the speech. He says, To me the relationship of this ministry to the making of peace is so obvious that I sometimes marvel at those who ask me why Im speaking against the war (12). Registration number: 419361 Showing his knowledge of the history of the war and using it to discredit the United States reason for being there is crucial to Dr. King in developing his position. There were many reasons why so many Americans were against the war. In his second paragraph, he connects with his audience by saying we have been repeatedly faced, For instance, in the second paragraph of his speech, he says, I could not be silent in the face of such cruel manipulation of the poor. The words silent, cruel, and manipulation speak out to an audience, especially for one that has faced hardship themselves in times of need. In his speech addressed to the laymen and clergy at Riverside Church he used pathos, logos, imagery, and an argument shift to list the reasons why America should withdraw their troops, and to create sympathy within his audience. It also uses a bit of strong imagery. Additionally, Kings statement that Southeast Asia is eight thousand miles away strengthens the irony by making Southeast Asia seem like a place which is completely disconnected from America. He says we were taking the black young men who had been crippled by our society and sending them eight thousand miles away to guarantee liberties in Southeast Asia which they had not found in southwest Georgia and East Harlem. King uses this statement to point out the inconsistency with America trying to establish freedom far away before establishing freedom on their own home soil. At last the paper discusses and assesses how to what an extent Kings dream came true with self-elected sources as backrest for the asses. Rhetorical Analysis Of Martin Luther King Beyond Vietnam 534 Words | 3 Pages In 1967, Martin Luther King Jr. delivered his speech "Beyond Vietnam-A Time to Break Silence." In the speech, King argues against American involvement in the Vietnam War and explains why he cannot remain silent. Dr. King further discredits the United States intentions in Vietnam by comparing us to Germany in World War II saying, What do they think as we test out our latest weapons on them, just as the Germans tested out new medicine and new tortures in the concentration camps of Europe? These statements serve to communicate to the audience that the speaker is someone of authority and should be listened to. They all had the same goal, but took a different approach with their speeches, and how they would rally support to improve racial equality. King is well aware that an audience that experiences strong emotional response to this speech is more likely to be convinced of his. It allows them to imagine what might happen if America were to keep fighting in the war. Introduction Martin Luther King, Jr in his speech "Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence" argued that US foreign policy was hypocritical when compared to the inequality present in the United States. The war according to King Jr. is nothing more than a political game played for the sake of fun and ego. Rodriguez 1 Melanie Rodriguez Ms. Jimenez Composition II 20 October, 2017 A Rhetorical Analysis of Martin Luther King Jr.'s "Beyond Vietnam" "Never be afraid to do what's right. In addition, his use of parallelism allows him to appeal to his audience's pity for the oppressed in order for him to express his call to action, a call for activism that goes beyond Vietnam. We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. Both religion and society condemn war and even popular religious figures have stood up to speak against it for the toll it takes upon human lives and for it is against the spirit of humanity and brotherhood. He repeatedly stresses upon breaking the silence because in this situation being silent was a sin. Kings letter is a response to those in the church who have critizied him, Yet, instead of apologizing, he stands strong for his cause and turns it around on them stating his own critisim. This use of repetitive language conveys urgency and shows that he deeply believes the churches may influence the government if they speak against the war. King uses personal anecdotes, elaborate word choice, and reliable facts to persuade his audience of the injustice of the war. For example, this quote personifies war as being an enemy. His use of diction and imagery arouses anger while increasing his credibility since he criticizes the unjust war he describes. Widely known for his work in the Civil Rights Movement, Martin Luther King Jr eventually also gained momentum in the anti-war movement against the war in Vietnam. (21). King is effectively able to convey his point about his topic by using rhetorical devices such as logos, ethos, pathos. "The Speech Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence by Martin Luther King, Jr: Rhetorical Analysis." Dr. King says that the war is draining valuable resources that could be helping the poor in our own country. King's criticism of the war as "broken and eviscerated," allows him to establish a disappointed tone that conveys the idea that the war is immoral and by doing so his precise word choice lets him to attack it as such. He efficiently uses the anecdote to tell how he has spoken with young men, telling them how violence will not solve their problems. In Dr. Martin Luther King's speech "Beyond VietnamA Time to Break Silence" (1967), Dr. King asserts that the war in Vietnam is totally immoral and has far reaching negative implications not only for Vietnam, but for The United States and the rest of the World as well. War is expensive. Not to mention, many young people protested because they were the ones being drafted while others were against the war because the anti-war movement grew increasingly popular among the counterculture and drug culture in American society and. Later in his speech, King writes again using an advanced vocabulary to reinforce his academic background with, America would never be free or saved from itself until the descendants of its slaves were loosed completely from the shackles they still wear. By using the word shackles, the reader can easily create a vivid image in their mind of how restricted the poor must feel, and whether it be physically or mentally, they can understand how much the restrained are longing for a sense of freedom. Overall, Martin Luther King Jr. eloquently argues against the United States involvement in Vietnam through his use of parallelism, diction, and imagery. Rhetorical Analysis of MLK's Speech "Beyond Vietnam". Using the approach, the context of the speech will be analyzed according to the classical cannon of rhetorical. One of Kings main techniques he uses to persuade the audience of his point is imagery. He also states, I say to you today, my friends, so even though we face the difficulties of today and tomorrow, I still have a dream. 663 Words; However, the persuasiveness of his speeches does not come solely from his ability to connect with his audience's emotions but from an extraordinary ability to reason and validate his point. Martin Luther King Jr., Malcom X, and Stokely Carmichael all had quite famous speeches that took a stance on racial inequality. So, what America is doing to other nations like Vietnam also matters. As example, King uses I have a dream that one day and Let freedom ring.. to open his points on how Americans should change against racial indifferences. He is disappointed in te church and his disappointment is worse because he feels so strongly for the church, as is evident through his tears. Would you like to get a custom case study? It also reminds people of inequality through images of everyday life in the United States. Likewise, during this time period, America [put little effort into] rehabilitation of its poor creating an even harder life for them (Source A). Retrieved from https://graduateway.com/rhetorical-analysis-of-martin-luther-kings-beyond-vietnam-a-time-to-break-silence/, Rhetorical of Analysis of Martin Luther Kings, I Have a Dream Speech, Break, Break, Break by Alfred Lord Tennyson Analysis, Martin Luther King Jr.: A Civil Rights Activist Who Changed, Rhetorical Analysis Martin Luther King Jr. versus Malcolm X, Martin Luther King Jr. When he argues that the war's immoral nature should be "incandescently clear," he implies to his audience that those who do not voice their opinion against the war are not concerned for, "the integrity and life of America.". The war lasted from 1955 to 1975.The nation as a whole began to uproar over the war and the major consequences of the war. Rhetorical Analysis of MLK's Speech "Beyond Vietnam", Key Ingredients to Being a Successful Student. On April 4, 1967 at Riverside Church in New York, MLK delivered "Beyond Vietnam" , which created a different perspective on the Vietnam war, in which is a negative thing. He then goes on to reveal some of his more personal feelings. Despite criticism from speaking out about things other than civil rights, King uses syntax, rhetorical strategies, and appeals to . You are free to use it to write your own assignment, however you must reference it properly. War makes the innocent lose hope and leaves behind horrific memories for generations on both sides. Some would be uninterested and some not knowing what to do. These emotionally charged images would seemingly convince anyone that the cause for this war could not possibly be just. For example, King says, We have waited for more than 340 years for our constitutional and God given rights (2). Moreover, this set of diction allows King to logically state that he can not continue to fight on behalf of the oppressed if he himself doesnt address their oppressor, the U.S. government. Luther was a charismatic leader who took a firm stand against the oppressive and racist regime of the United States (US), devoting much of his life towards uniting the segregated African-American community of the US. Analyzes how john kerry's "beyond vietnam- a time to break silence" by martin luther king jr. uses rhetorical devices that emphasize the importance and meaning of his speech. Furthermore the Kings parallel structure clarifies and highlights his intent by building up to a more important point. Due to the Vietnam War is that plenty of individuals, both Americans and Vietnamese were killed. For instance, he starts by stating the effects of the Vietnam War forced the American poverty program: "experiments, hopes, new beginnings." He expresses his anguish at seeing people of Vietnam and America suffer and also notes that if American folks do not break their silence they stand to lose much more than their opponents. He also reminds the church leaders of something seemingly obvious that they may have lost sight of: the Father is deeply concerned especially for his suffering and helpless and outcast children (13). King draws sympathy for his cause from the reader who sees the unjustness of the situation he and his followers are dealing with. During the final years of . Go back to Mississippi, go back to Alabama, go back to South Carolina, go back to Georgia, go back to Louisiana, go back to the slums and ghettos of our northern cities, knowing that somehow this situation can and will be changed. During this time period there was a lot of controversy surrounding the war. Later, he mentions, I am a preacher by calling, I suppose it is not surprising that I have seven major reasons for bringing Vietnam into the field of my moral vision. (King). His masterful delivery of these metaphors and the frequent repetition makes the speech much like a poem or a part of a song. To make his claims stand out and have a deeper impact, he uses instances from Vietnamese history to show the level of injustice faced by its people how war has destabilized them. A lot of parts from Martin Luther Kings dream have come true, but it is still not all that is how King wanted it to be. Martin Luther King Jr. disagreed with the way the war was being handled, and thought nonviolent demonstrations would be more efficient. Martin Luther King Jr. was a social activist that led the Civil Rights Movement, and other movements until his assassination in 1968. Read a rhetorical analysis of Martin Luther King Jr's Beyond Vietnam: Time to break silence. Martin Luther King, Jr indicates that he is seen as a figure of authority by the civil rights movement. - M.J. King calms the African Americans who are being oppressed by using the words, this situation can and will be changed. and Let us not wallow in the valley of despair. which gives them hope that there will be a new day when a change will take place. https://studycorgi.com/the-speech-beyond-vietnam-a-time-to-break-silence-by-martin-luther-king-jr-rhetorical-analysis/. A Time to do What is Right. For example, he writes vicious mobs lynch your mothers and fathers at will, drown your sisters and brothers and hated filled policemen even kill your brothers and sisters (3). Issues have been resolved because now the draft is less common because more people volunteer for war so the poor are not forced. Rhetorical Analysis Of Beyond Vietnam: A Time To Break Silence, During the 20th century, the Vietnam War had a profound impact on Americans, but there was a side of the story that was less known- voices from the poor. This part of the speech is evoking violent images of death that would affect the emotions of the audience. The Speech Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence by Martin Luther King, Jr: Rhetorical Analysis. All of Dr. Kings arguments are very effective. The fact that young black men are being sent [across the world] to fight for the liberties in Southeast Asia, which they [have] not found in Georgia and East Harlem questions the validity of Americas founding principles of the unalienable rights of every individual; life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Rhetorical devices are included in Martin Luther Kings speeches to prove conflict. Also, if you have a comment about a particular piece of work on this website, please go to the page where that work is displayed and post a comment on it. Don't let the fear of striking out keep you from playing the game. While his words clearly deliver his disappointment over the path American government had chosen, it also expresses a clear intention to not be with the wrong and instead listen to ones inner voice. A comment like this doesnt leave the reader unmoved. He is using historical facts to create a parallel between the current situation and the past. King said, the war was doing far more than devastating the hopes of the poor at homeWe were taking the black young men who had been crippled by our society and sending them eight thousand miles away to guarantee liberties in Southeast Asia which they had not found in southwest Georgia and East Harlem.

Boeing Jobs St Louis Entry Level, Sonnenberg's Meat Boxes, What Percentage Of Marriages End In Divorce Worldwide, What Did Michael Peters Choreographer, What Happened To Brit On Crime Junkie, Articles B